Her Metabolic Health is a clinical research repository designed to bridge the gap between complex medical data and patient action. We believe that metabolic health is not a moral failing, but a biological system requiring tactical management. Published by unLit Publishing LLC, we provide an independent, patient-first perspective on GLP-1 receptor agonists, hormone restoration, and the shifting landscape of metabolic science for women nationwide.
We function as a "medical complex outsider" to maintain independence, yet our work is strictly anchored in peer-reviewed science. Every insight translates primary data from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and PubMed into actionable patient literacy.
As Research Lead, Cat focuses on the intersection of patient experience and clinical data. She is the author of Fat Bitch: Killing the Willpower Myth and is dedicated to dismantling the moral biases that prevent women from accessing modern metabolic tools.
Dee directs the editorial strategy and integrity of the repository. She ensures that every piece of content meets our standards for accuracy, accessibility, and relevance to the evolving needs of the metabolic health community.
At Her Metabolic Health, we don’t guess; we curate. Our value lies in our independence from the traditional medical complex, which allows us to prioritize patient literacy and biological truth over institutional bias.
We do not rely on second-hand health reporting. Every insight published in our repository is anchored in primary sources, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and PubMed for clinical trial data, the World Health Organization (WHO) for global metabolic trends, and peer-Reviewed Journals specifically focusing on endocrinology, neurology, and GLP-1 receptor agonist pharmacology.
Clinical trials are often written in a dialect designed to be inaccessible to the average patient. Our lead curators, Cat Clark and Dee Stone, utilize the Shared Agency Framework to translate these "med-speak" findings into tactical literacy. We break down complex p-values and hazard ratios into what actually matters: how it affects your biology and your agency.
Traditional metabolic advice is often clouded by "willpower" myths and moral judgment. We filter all incoming research through a bias-neutral lens. If a study is funded by an entity with a conflict of interest, we disclose it. If the data shows a systemic failure in how women are treated for metabolic syndrome, we highlight it.
We believe that knowledge is the first step toward ownership. Our methodology includes providing "Physician Advocacy Tools"—specific, data-backed questions and research summaries—that you can take into your next clinical appointment. We provide the evidence; you provide the advocacy.